AFC Thoughts

The Technology Behind Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem: A Deep Dive

Site Logo
Tookitaki
24 Aug 2023
10 min
read

In an age marked by the rapid pace of technological advancement and globalization, financial crime has emerged as a multi-faceted and increasingly complex problem. From money laundering schemes that cloak illicit funds within layers of legitimate transactions to sophisticated frauds that exploit the digital vulnerabilities of modern banking, financial institutions face a daunting array of threats that evolve almost as quickly as the technologies designed to stop them. The situation has further been aggravated by the digital transformation of the financial sector, which has expanded the avenues through which criminals can exploit the system. 

As financial crime becomes more intricate, traditional rule-based approaches to compliance and monitoring are falling short. The old systems, often isolated silos of data, are unable to adapt swiftly to the constantly shifting regulatory landscape and emerging typologies of financial crime. Moreover, these systems face severe limitations in scalability, speed, and accuracy.

Recognizing the limitations of existing solutions and the dire need for innovation, Tookitaki has pioneered the Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem—an advanced platform designed to bring the fight against financial crime into the 21st century. With a focus on community collaboration, the AFC Ecosystem combines state-of-the-art technology with collective expertise to create a holistic, adaptive, and extremely effective compliance solution. It moves beyond the reactive and isolated approaches of the past, towards a proactive, unified, and intelligent model that is better suited to tackle the complex challenges posed by modern financial systems.

The Growing Challenges of Financial Crime

The Escalating Risks: Statistics and Trends

Financial crime is not just a persistent issue; it's an escalating one. According to a report from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, it is estimated that the amount of money laundered globally in one year is 2-5% of global GDP, or $800 billion to $2 trillion in current U.S. dollars. Moreover, cybercrime costs are predicted to reach $10.5 trillion annually by 2025, a threefold increase from the 2015 figures. These astronomical numbers underline the enormous scale and gravity of the problem.

But it's not just the volume of financial crime that's concerning; it's also its complexity. Criminal networks are increasingly leveraging sophisticated technologies like artificial intelligence and blockchain to conceal their activities, making it harder for authorities to detect and trace illicit transactions. 

The Burden on Financial Institutions: Operational Challenges and Compliance Costs

Financial institutions find themselves at the forefront of this battle, saddled with the dual responsibilities of not only safeguarding customers' assets but also ensuring rigorous compliance with a growing and ever-changing set of regulations. In the U.S. alone, regulatory compliance costs the financial services sector upwards of $270 billion every year.

One of the biggest operational challenges is the integration and updating of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) systems. Traditional rule-based systems are inadequate in handling the dynamic changes in regulations and typologies of financial crime, requiring constant manual updates and tuning. This process is not only cumbersome but also prone to errors, exposing institutions to regulatory risks.

Major banks report taking up to nine months to onboard new compliance scenarios—time during which they are vulnerable to emerging threats. Additionally, this protracted process comes with a high cost. For instance, threshold tuning—a critical part of implementing new scenarios—alone can require significant manpower and financial resources. For burgeoning fintech companies eager to disrupt the market with new products, this operational bottleneck can severely stymie growth and innovation.

Limitations of Traditional Approaches

The Pitfalls of Rule-Based Systems

Traditional approaches to combating financial crime have predominantly relied on rule-based systems. These systems operate on predefined sets of rules that identify suspicious activities based on certain criteria, such as large transactions over a specific threshold, multiple small transactions within a short period, or transactions to high-risk geographical locations.

While straightforward and relatively easy to implement, rule-based systems come with a host of limitations. First, they are highly susceptible to false positives and negatives. Given their rigid criteria, they may flag innocuous transactions as suspicious while missing activities that don't fit within their predefined rules but are nonetheless illicit.

Secondly, these systems operate in isolation due to data privacy and security regulations, making it difficult to share information and insights between different departments within the same organization, let alone with other organizations. This lack of data sharing hampers the collective understanding of evolving financial crime tactics, creating vulnerabilities.

The Need for Speed: Adapting to a Changing Regulatory Landscape

In the current era, financial crime is not stagnant; it's an evolving menace that adapts to countermeasures swiftly. This requires financial institutions to be equally agile in adapting to new forms of financial crime as well as to changing regulatory landscapes. However, the monolithic and inflexible architecture of traditional rule-based systems makes them slow to adapt to these changes.

New rules and updates don't just need to be coded into the system; they also need to undergo extensive testing before they can go live. This whole process is both time-consuming and resource-intensive. For instance, major banks report taking up to nine months to implement new compliance scenarios, making them vulnerable to new and emerging threats during this period.

Given this backdrop, there's a growing recognition that traditional methods are inadequate for the challenges of today's fast-paced and complex financial environment. What's needed is an approach that can adapt quickly to changing regulatory norms and emerging threats—an approach that Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem aims to offer.

Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem: A Revolutionary Approach

In a world where financial crime is becoming increasingly complex and adaptive, the need for a robust, agile, and community-driven approach has never been more acute. Enter Tookitaki's Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem—a platform designed to address these challenges head-on by marrying advanced technology with the collective intelligence of a network of experts.

AFC Network + Typology Repository

Core Components: AFC Network and Typology Repository

The AFC Ecosystem comprises two main pillars: the AFC Network and the Typology Repository. These components work in tandem to create a comprehensive and dynamic system that evolves with the ever-changing landscape of financial crime.

AFC Network

Purpose and Participants

The AFC Network serves as a hub for professionals across various sectors, including financial institutions, risk advisory firms, law firms, and international NGOs, all united by a common goal: combating financial crime. This broad array of expertise provides a rich well of resources and knowledge for identifying and understanding new and emerging threats.

How it Fosters Collaboration

The AFC Network encourages the sharing of intelligence, best practices, and typologies related to money laundering, fraud, and other forms of financial crime. This shared intelligence allows for more effective targeting of resources, enhances the resiliency of financial crime programs, and keeps all network members abreast of the latest developments in the field. The collaborative nature of the AFC Network addresses one of the key shortcomings of traditional methods—the inability to share insights across organizations due to regulatory constraints and data privacy concerns.

Typology Repository

Based on Federated Learning

The Typology Repository is not just a database; it's an intelligent platform based on federated learning, which enables the sharing of information in a secure and privacy-preserving manner. Federated learning allows for the aggregation of insights from various organizations without directly sharing sensitive or personally identifiable information (PII), overcoming a significant hurdle in traditional financial crime-fighting methods.

Key Functionalities Offered to AFC Network Members

Members of the AFC Network have access to a variety of functionalities within the Typology Repository. These include Typology Design Studio, Federated Insights Card and Federated Knowledge Base. 

By combining the collaborative capabilities of the AFC Network with the advanced technological solutions housed in the Typology Repository, Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem represents a paradigm shift in the fight against financial crime.

The Tech Behind the AFC Ecosystem

Understanding the technology that powers Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem is crucial for appreciating its revolutionary impact on the financial industry. The ecosystem is built on state-of-the-art tech components that not only offer solutions for today's challenges but are also designed to evolve with the emerging threats of tomorrow. Below, we delve into the technology of the three primary components of the system: Typology Design Studio, Federated Insights Card, and Federated Knowledge Base.

Typology Design Studio

Features and How It Enables Professionals to Create and Review Typologies

The Typology Design Studio is a unique workspace that allows financial crime experts to construct and validate typologies. It offers a no-code, drag-and-drop interface, making it user-friendly and efficient. Users can configure properties for entities and both transactional and non-transactional aspects. Moreover, it includes standardized programmatic tokens that encapsulate the modus operandi of financial crimes without sharing any Personally Identifiable Information (PII).

One standout feature is the in-built review workflow. It ensures that typologies are critically reviewed for accuracy and completeness before they go live, offering an extra layer of quality control. This collaborative review process aligns perfectly with the AFC Ecosystem's overarching mission of fostering community-based insight.

Federated Insights Card

What It Is and How It's Generated

Once a typology is approved through the Typology Design Studio, a Federated Insights Card is automatically generated. These cards are essentially programmatic digitizations of financial crime risks. They serve as structured intelligence assets that capture the essence of each typology, encapsulating key information in a digestible format.

Its Role in Decision-Making

The Federated Insights Cards play a vital role in decision-making by allowing financial institutions to quickly understand the risks associated with different typologies. They can be downloaded and disseminated across various channels, making it easier for AFC Network members to integrate these insights into their risk assessments and decision-making processes. This functionality replaces the traditional, cumbersome methods of sharing paper-based or electronic reports, significantly speeding up the reaction time to emerging threats.

Federated Knowledge Base

Description and Key Features

The Federated Knowledge Base is essentially a library of these Federated Insights Cards. It stands as the largest community-curated database of financial crime patterns and typologies. Each card in this database has been reviewed and approved by experts in the AFC Network, ensuring a high level of credibility and relevance.

How Smart Select and Smart Discover Work

Navigating such a vast repository could be daunting, but the Federated Knowledge Base makes this easy with features like Smart Select and Smart Discover.

  • Smart Select: A free search field that scans the database to provide the most relevant matches based on the user input. This feature eliminates the need to manually sift through endless records, offering a quick and efficient way to find pertinent information.
  • Smart Discover: This feature allows users to add multiple filters to their search, narrowing down the results to the most relevant Insights Cards. Users can filter based on criteria such as type of financial crime, geographic location, or financial products involved, making it easier to find tailored insights.

By integrating these tech components seamlessly, Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem provides an agile, collaborative, and intelligent solution to combating financial crime. It represents a new era in which technology and community-driven insights coalesce to create a safer and more secure financial landscape.

{{cta-ebook}}

Case Study: A Leading Fintech in Singapore

The increasing complexity of financial crimes and the rapid evolution of regulatory landscapes present unique challenges for fintech companies. In this case study, we'll explore how a leading fintech company in Singapore leveraged Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem to navigate these challenges successfully.

Background and Challenges

In the fast-paced, highly competitive digital banking environment of Singapore, our client, a next-generation digital bank, aiming for a swift yet compliant launch. The challenges were manifold:

  • Meeting the stringent requirements set forth by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
  • Adapting to changing local and international regulations.
  • Establishing typologies based on local rules and conditions.

The hurdles were not just about compliance but also about achieving these goals in a time-efficient manner to maintain a competitive edge.

How AFC Ecosystem Provided Solutions

The fintech company turned to Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem for a community-driven, agile solution to their compliance woes. The system offered:

  • Access to the Federated Knowledge Base: An expansive, continuously updated repository of financial crime typologies and risk factors.
  • Relevant Typologies for MAS Compliance: By tapping into the AFC Network and Typology Repository, the digital bank could identify the typologies most relevant to MAS regulations.
  • Expert-Validated Typologies: The typologies they employed were not just compliant but had been validated by a network of AML experts, making their implementation smoother and more credible during model validation.
  • Quick Implementation: The fintech firm successfully deployed over 20 typologies, encompassing various financial products like savings accounts, lending, payment, and SME banking.

Results and Benefits Achieved

The advantages were immediately apparent:

  • 100% Risk Coverage: By leveraging expert-validated typologies, the digital bank could confidently state they had full coverage of known financial crime risks as per MAS regulations.
  • ~50% Reduction in Time to Onboard New Scenarios: With the help of the AFC Ecosystem, the time to implement new compliance scenarios was cut in half, significantly speeding up their journey to full compliance and market readiness.

By integrating the AFC Ecosystem into its compliance strategy, the fintech firm not only met but exceeded regulatory expectations, positioning itself as a leader in risk management and compliance. This case study serves as a compelling testament to the tangible benefits of adopting Tookitaki's revolutionary approach to fighting financial crime.

Final Thoughts

The financial industry is at a critical juncture. With financial crimes becoming increasingly sophisticated and regulatory landscapes continuously evolving, traditional methods of compliance are no longer sufficient. The challenges are not just regulatory but are fundamentally about protecting the integrity and safety of the financial ecosystem. As we've seen, no single institution can effectively tackle these problems in isolation.

This is why the community-driven approach pioneered by Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem is so revolutionary. By fostering a sense of shared responsibility and collective intelligence, the AFC Ecosystem enables financial institutions to not only keep up with the challenges but also to turn compliance into a strategic advantage. The ecosystem's robust functionalities, ranging from the AFC Network to the Typology Repository, enable rapid, scalable, and cost-effective solutions for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT).

In a world where criminals are constantly evolving their tactics, a static defence is no defence at all. The AFC Ecosystem offers a dynamic, community-driven shield against financial crimes. It provides a platform where expertise is shared, challenges are collectively addressed, and solutions are jointly developed. By democratizing insights and fostering collaboration, Tookitaki is not merely keeping up with the criminals; it's staying one step ahead.

We encourage all financial institutions, from established banks to emerging fintech companies, to join the AFC Ecosystem. Together, we can build a safer, more secure financial environment for everyone involved. By embracing this revolutionary approach, financial institutions are not just fulfilling regulatory requirements; they are actively contributing to a safer and more secure financial future for all. Join us in this endeavour and be part of the solution.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

AFC Thoughts
18 Jul 2024
4 min
read

Typology Tales July 2024: Account Takeover Surveillance

We are pleased to share the latest edition of "Typology Tales" for July 2024. This edition highlights the new typologies that our Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) community has carefully analysed and selected. Our community's collective efforts are crucial in staying ahead of evolving financial crime threats, and we are grateful for your continued participation and contributions.

AFC Community’s Role

Each month, our dedicated AFC community comes together to analyze and evaluate newly created typologies, selecting those that can significantly enhance the ecosystem's ability to prevent and combat financial crime. The typologies chosen for publication are those that offer the most promise in terms of effectiveness and applicability across various scenarios.

Key Highlights from July 2024 

These typologies have been meticulously curated to ensure they provide robust and actionable insights, ultimately helping to safeguard the financial ecosystem.

Theme of the Month: Account Takeover Fraud (ATO)

Theme of the month

Account takeover fraud (ATO) is a type of cybercrime where unauthorised people access a user's account and use it for harmful purposes. This dangerous activity has increased significantly in recent times, posing a growing threat to both individuals and organisations. 

In this edition...

In this edition of Typology Tales, we delve into two typologies that compliance professionals can incorporate into their transaction fraud monitoring systems to proactively prevent account takeover in real time.

Typology 1: Surge in Multi-Party Transactions in Sizeable Values

Typology-multiple counterparty

A pattern of multiple parties making high-value transactions with one entity in a short period of  time suggests possible account takeover fraud. This requires a strategic review of transaction behaviours.

How It Works

  • The typology monitors transactions involving a single customer who receives or transfers funds with multiple parties within a short time span.
  • To identify potential account takeover risks, the typology groups transactions by the unique identifiers of senders and receivers within a specified time frame. By tracking these identifiers over a defined period, it can determine how many different parties have transacted with a particular entity.

  • Simultaneously, the typology aggregates the transaction amounts linked to unique senders and receivers.

  • It flags any entity that engages in transactions with a large number of different parties and exceeds a cumulative transaction threshold. This signals potential account takeover risks due to unauthorised access and high-value transactions.

Typology 2: Monitoring High-Value Transactions Across Multiple Payment Modes

15 - 2024 July Edition TT Typology tales-1-1-1-1

Financial institutions may implement advanced monitoring to detect high-value transactions between senders and receivers through various modes, aiming to uncover potential account takeover fraud.

How It Works

  • To effectively oversee the flow of funds, the typology tracks and aggregates transaction amounts based on the mode of transfer.
  • Transaction amounts, including those made through cash or alternative payments, are further aggregated by the unique identifiers of the sender and receiver over a specific period.
  • Entities showing high-value transactions across multiple payment modes over specified time frames are potentially flagged as suspicious. This increased activity may indicate that an account has been compromised and is being used to funnel funds illegally.

From the Media: Account Takeover Attacks Overtake Ransomware as Leading Security Concern

Research by cybersecurity firm Abnormal Security highlights that account takeover (ATO) attacks have become a top concern for security leaders. The 2024 State of Cloud Account Takeover Attacks report reveals that 83% of organisations experienced at least one ATO incident in the past year. 

Over 75% of security leaders rank ATOs among the top four global cyber threats, with nearly 50% facing more than five incidents annually and around 20% encountering over ten incidents. ATOs are now considered more significant than other threats such as spear phishing and ransomware.

Read More

Unite in the Fight Against Financial Crime

Financial crime is a pervasive issue that requires a collective, centralised approach to intelligence gathering. That's why we have created the Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem, a network of experts who work together to share knowledge and develop strategies for combating financial crime.

If you are an AFC expert, we invite you to join our efforts and help us grow the AFC Ecosystem. And if you know any other AFC experts, please refer them to us so we can continue to expand and strengthen our network. Together, we can make a real difference in the fight against financial crime.

Typology Tales July 2024: Account Takeover Surveillance
AFC Thoughts
01 Jul 2024
3 min
read

Account Takeover Fraud: Monitoring Entities Incorporated Long Back

In the evolving landscape of financial crime, financial institutions need to intensify their scrutiny of transactions from entities with a long history of incorporation but sporadic or recent activity. This increased vigilance aims to detect and thwart potential account takeover fraud within savings accounts, ensuring the safety and integrity of financial systems.

Given below is a typology from Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem. It details how to ensure your monitoring system triggers alerts transactions from entities with a long history of incorporation

Understanding the Typology

Setting Up Entity Historical Profiles

Financial institutions employ a function known as the "Incorporation Date of the Entity" to track and record the incorporation dates and transaction activities of entities. This function helps identify entities that have been established long ago but have shown recent or sudden transaction activities, which could be indicative of fraud.

Function Configuration and Data Aggregation

  • Aggregate Fields: The system aggregates data on 'sender incorporation date' and 'receiver incorporation date.'
  • Aggregate Function: Using the collect_set function, the system compiles a unique set of incorporation dates for each sender and receiver, providing a comprehensive historical perspective of each entity's transaction timeline.
  • Group By: Transactions are grouped by unique identifiers like 'sender_hashcode' and 'receiver_hashcode,' linking each entity’s transaction history to specific account profiles.

Monitoring and Anomaly Detection

The system continuously monitors the transaction activities of these entities, comparing current transactions against historical data. Entities that have shown no or minimal transaction activities for a significant period since their incorporation are closely watched. A sudden spike in transactions, especially those of significant volume or frequency, triggers an alert. This scrutiny is particularly heightened if the entity's previous activity has been minimal or non-existent for years.

Group 16190-1

Flagging and Review Process

Transactions involving long-dormant entities resuming activity are flagged as high-risk. These flagged transactions undergo a detailed review to ascertain the legitimacy of the activity and to rule out any potential account takeover or other fraudulent intentions.

Investigative Measures

For flagged transactions, financial institutions conduct thorough investigations involving:

  • Background Checks: Verifying the entity's background.
  • Transaction Legitimacy: Confirming the legitimacy of the transaction.
  • Entity Ownership: Ensuring the entity's ownership and operational status.

Preventative Actions and Customer Interaction

If fraudulent activity is confirmed, financial institutions take immediate steps to:

  • Block further transactions.
  • Secure the affected accounts.
  • Possibly reverse fraudulent transactions.
  • Contact entity representatives for further clarification and to ensure all parties are informed of the situation.

Compliance and Reporting Obligations

All suspicious activities are documented and reported in compliance with regulatory requirements. This ensures that the institution remains compliant with anti-fraud regulations and aids in broader efforts to combat financial crime.

{{cta-ebook}}

Enhancement of Monitoring Systems

Based on findings and trends observed from monitoring these entities, financial institutions continually refine their detection algorithms and update their monitoring systems to better identify and prevent potential fraud.

By closely monitoring the activities of entities incorporated long ago but recently active, banks can effectively spot unusual patterns that may indicate fraudulent activities, such as account takeovers. This proactive approach helps safeguard customer assets and maintain the integrity of the financial system.

Final Thoughts

Financial institutions must remain vigilant and proactive in monitoring and analyzing transaction activities, especially those involving historically dormant entities. This typology, sourced from Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem, highlights the importance of advanced monitoring techniques in detecting potential fraud.

We encourage anti-financial crime professionals to join the AFC Ecosystem to access unique typologies and leverage community-driven insights for enhanced fraud detection and prevention. Together, we can strengthen our defenses against financial crime and protect the integrity of our financial systems.

Account Takeover Fraud: Monitoring Entities Incorporated Long Back
AFC Thoughts
22 May 2024
3 min
read

The Globalization of Fraud: The Rise of Transnational Scams

In an increasingly interconnected world, the borders that once confined criminal activities are rapidly dissolving, aided by the rise of digitalisation and the pervasive reach of online platforms. The stark reality we face today is a landscape where fraudsters exploit digital payment systems to target individuals across the globe, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. Organised fraud syndicates are not just local threats; they operate on an international scale, executing sophisticated scams that often outpace current preventative measures.

Case Study: A Transnational Crackdown on Job Scams

On 20 March 2024, a significant breakthrough came when the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) of the Singapore Police Force and the Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department of the Royal Malaysia Police joined forces in Kuala Lumpur. This joint operation was the culmination of extensive cross-border investigative efforts aimed at dismantling a formidable job scam syndicate.

Between October 2023 and January 2024, this syndicate deceived over 3,000 individuals, accumulating illicit gains of approximately $45.7 million. These scams primarily targeted Singaporeans, promising lucrative job opportunities that required victims to make upfront payments or divulge sensitive information under the guise of securing employment. The rapid escalation of these scams prompted an intensive collaborative investigation, which eventually led to the arrest of five Malaysians involved in laundering the proceeds from these fraudulent activities.

This operation not only highlights the severity and reach of transnational scams but also underscores the urgent need for global cooperation and shared strategies to combat these crimes effectively.

Job Scam

The Imperative of a Collaborative Approach

As we witness a surge in transnational fraud, the isolation of financial institutions in their silos makes them particularly vulnerable. The complexity and rapid adaptation of fraud strategies require that defences be equally dynamic and interconnected.

Collective Intelligence and Shared Responsibility

To counteract the evolving menace of cross-border fraud effectively, a collaborative approach is indispensable. The AFC Ecosystem initiative represents a commitment to fostering industry-wide cooperation and information sharing. Through this collective intelligence, we aim to establish a robust defence mechanism that not only identifies but also anticipates fraudulent activities, ensuring safe and secure societies. This shared responsibility is vital in creating an impenetrable barrier against the sophisticated mechanisms of modern financial criminals.

Considering the Typology of the AFC Ecosystem

Drawing from the AFC Ecosystem's insights, let's delve into the typology of transnational job scams. This framework is instrumental in understanding how these frauds operate and what measures can be employed to thwart their attempts.

Detailed Analysis of the Typology

Transnational job scams represent a highly organized and rapidly proliferating threat that exploits the aspirations of job seekers worldwide. These scams are not just about deceit regarding employment opportunities but involve intricate financial manipulations that siphon funds across international borders.

Operational Mechanics

  • Initial Recruitment: The scam begins with contact through social media or other digital platforms, where victims are lured with high-return, low-effort job offers.
  • Deceptive Promises: The roles are advertised as lucrative yet simple enough to attract a wide demographic, from students to the unemployed.
  • Financial Prerequisites: Victims are persuaded to make upfront payments or provide personal information as a part of the onboarding process.
  • Expeditious Expansion: To maximize profits before any potential crackdown, these operations quickly scale and replicate across various regions.

{{cta-ebook}}

Granular Red Flags and Risk Indicators

To effectively monitor and prevent these scams, it is crucial to recognise the following detailed risk indicators:

  • Value: Transactions often involve small amounts that are usually perceived as low-risk by victims, making them less likely to raise immediate alarms.
  • Volume: A high frequency of transactions complicates tracking and analysis, as the sheer number of transactions can overwhelm standard monitoring systems.
  • Velocity: The rapid succession of payments, coupled with potential chargebacks or cancellations, creates a chaotic financial trail that is difficult to follow.
  • Channels: Scammers predominantly use digital payment platforms, online banking, and occasionally cryptocurrencies to maintain anonymity and complicate tracing.
  • Anonymity: There is often a mismatch between beneficiary details and the purported employer, signalling a red flag for transactions.
  • Recurrence: Victims are frequently solicited for multiple payments under various pretexts, each justified as necessary for job commencement or continuation.
  • High-risk Geos: Payments are directed to accounts in high-risk jurisdictions or to those that are otherwise unrelated or suspicious, lacking any logical connection to the job or employer.
  • Geographical Inconsistencies: The involved countries often have no direct connection to the alleged job or employer, exploiting the complexities of international law and jurisdictional boundaries.

Harnessing Collective Efforts for Enhanced Security

The fight against transnational fraud is not a battle that can be won in isolation. It requires the concerted efforts of financial institutions, regulatory bodies, law enforcement, and the public. By adopting the typology provided by the AFC Ecosystem and vigilantly monitoring the detailed risk indicators, we can forge a path towards a more secure and resilient financial environment. This collective approach is our best defense against the sophisticated and ever-evolving landscape of global fraud.

The Globalization of Fraud: The Rise of Transnational Scams